Tuesday, 13 September 2011

Reading Buffy Synoptically: Musings on Sex and Relationships in Buffy

Buffy the Vampire Slayer is a show which portrays high school and college life and sex and relationships, those omnipresent aspects of high school and college life, as just another aspect of human life in general and as just another aspect of our Scoobies lives in particular.

Xander is, as the show makes clear, obsessed with sex, at least in his high school and early post-high school years (“Ear Shot”, “Becoming, Part 1” with the wonderful linoleum makes me think of sex line). But he doesn’t remain locked in a holding pattern where every other thought he thinks concerns sex. Like all of the Scoobies he grows and changes over the course of the show. Where once he obsessed on praying mantis woman (“Teacher’s Pet”), fell in love with Inca mummy girl (“Inca Mummy Girl”), had a short term relationship with sometime Scooby Cordelia Chase (from What’s My Line Part 1 to “Lovers Walk”), and had a brief flirtation with fellow Scooby Willow (“Homecoming”, by “Lovers Walk”), he finally couples with Anya, an ex-vengeance demon and patron of scorned women (“The Prom”, “The Harsh Light of Day”), and has what appears to be a genuine and sexually fulfilling relationship with her even though, like almost everything on Buffy, this doesn’t mean eternal TV happiness for them (from “The Harsh Light of Day” through “Hells Bells”).

In Buffy sex is just another aspect of Scooby lives. And have sex they do. Willow has sex with Oz (“Graduation Day, Part 1”, “Graduation Day, Part 2”), Tara (“Who Are You?”), and Kennedy (“Touched”). Buffy has sex with her longtime boyfriend Angel (“Surprise”, “Innocence”), with Parker, the devotee of the pleasure principle (“The Harsh Light of Day”), with her secret agent world domination manly man Riley (much of season four), and with her vamp boy toy Spike (Season six beginning with “Smashed”). While the sex Buffy and Angel have has nasty consequences—it activates a vengeance curse placed on him by Gypsies turning him into the brutally evil Angelus when he experiences this true moment of happiness--their sex is not condemned. The problem, of course, with the Buffy/Angel relationship is that Angel is a vampire while Buffy is the Slayer and that Angel is substantially older than Buffy. He is, in other words, exactly the wrong guy for her, something Buffy’s mom Joyce, vampire Spike, and Season three’s “Big Bad” Mayor Wilkins recognise before she does (“Lovers Walk”, “Choices”, and “The Prom”).

Buffy is not the only one of our protagonists with relationship problems. Scooby Xander’s problem is his past, especially his dysfunctional family past and the effect this has on his relationship with Anya. His dreary family background has made him fearful of what his life will be like and it has made it difficult for him to commit to coupling with anyone (“Restless” and much of Season six culminating in “Hell’s Bells”). He also remains deeply in love with Buffy and deeply jealous of anyone else who loves her (“Becoming, Part 2”, “Entropy”).

Sex and girls or boys, of course, are not the only things the Scoobies think about or are involved in. Yes they think about sex. Yes they have sex. Yes their sex has consequences. Yes they reflect on their failed relationships, sometimes even learning and growing from them. But they also worry about the evil in their midst. They worry about the next apocalypse they might face. And they worry about their mundane and not so mundane futures.

Reading Buffy Synopically: Musings on Buffy's Theodicy

For Neal King (“Brownskirts: Fascism, Christianity, and the Eternal Demon” in James South (ed.); Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy:Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale (Chicago: Open Court, 2003) Buffy is not so much about the girl next door as the proto- if not outright vigilante fascist down the street who leads the forces of “good” against a host of “evil” “others”. For King, Buffy, with its dualistic distinction between good humans and evil vampires, demons, monsters, and witches is nothing more than another ugly manichean fairy tale about us the good and them the bad. In King’s mental world the Scoobies are the jackbooted and brownskirted or brownshirted defenders of a vicious human nationalism that won’t stop goose slaying their way through Sunnydale until every evil vamp, demon, monster, and witch in their way is dead.

Leaving aside the convoluted and much debated issue of just what fascism is, King is right, there is a manichean tendency in the media and in the ethnocentric ideologies and nationalisms that rule our world. This dualism is not, however, characteristic of the Buffyverse. By asserting this, in fact, King, misses a central concern of the Buffyverse, namely its emphasis on the reality of evil in our midst and the ability of individuals to escape the evil in their own hearts.

In the Buffyverse evil is depicted as having real ontological status, as being present not just in every demon but potentially in every human. In Buffy this evil is something which it is right and moral to fight against as best as one can. Nowhere is the idea that responsive violence is just under specific circumstances expressed more clearly and systematically than in the episode “Pangs”.

In “Pangs” Buffy is a freshman at UC, Sunnydale and it’s her first Thanksgiving away from home. Her mother is out of town and the Buffster has decided she wants to have a traditional turkey day dinner for the Scooby Gang at Giles’ place. As so often happens in Sunnydale, however, things don’t always go as planned. During a groundbreaking ceremony for a new cultural centre on the UC, Sunnydale campus the old Sunnydale Mission, which was thought destroyed, is unearthed. The digging also unleashes the vengeful spirit of a Chumash Indian who later raises other Chumash spirits to do to whites what the Whites did to him and his tribe. The Chumash, as Willow tells us at the beginning of the episode, were brutalised, infected by disease, disfigured, and murdered by Europeans who settled in California. It’s now pay back time. Hus kills a UC, Sunnydale anthropologist in charge of the cultural centre. He kills a local Catholic priest. Finally, after Hus has raised other Chumash warrior spirits, they come after Sunnydale’s strongest warrior, Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

In the meantime, once Buffy, Willow, and Giles figure out that the Chumash are returning to avenge what was done to them they debate just what they should do about it. Willow, recounting all the wrongs that were done to the Chumash opposes killing them. They are, she points out, just doing to Whites what Whites did to them. Giles counters that the Chumash are killing innocent people and so must be stopped. Buffy, while sympathetic to Willow’s position, realises that she must stop the revived Chumash spirit warriors before they kill again. She prefers to do it peacefully and diplomatically but is willing to use more forceful means if necessary. When the Chumash attack the Scoobies, however, this debate becomes moot. All of the Scoobies, including Willow, defend themselves and eventually defeat the Chumash in battle. The moral? When attacked you have every right to defend yourself. Violence, in other words, is just in the Buffyverse when you are responding to violence. And responsive violence is proper if you are the Scoobies defending the weak and unknowing against such attacks.

Despite the depiction of evil as ever present and ever violent Buffy doesn’t portray the demonic or the monstrous in strictly manichean terms. In Buffy humans, vampires, demons, ghosts, and monsters alike all have the potentiality for both good and evil as Giles tells Buffy in “Beauty and the Beasts”. In the first, second, and third seasons of the show we learn that humans can do evil (“Welcome to the Hellmouth”) and that vampires can do good (“Angel”), that there are bad witches (Amy’s mother Catherine in “The Witch”), that there are good witches (“Gingerbread”), that there are good witches whose spells sometimes go awry (“Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered”), that there are demons who do good (the demon Whistler maintains the balance between good and evil in the world and contacts Buffy when Angel morphs into the thoroughly evil Angelus (“Becoming, Part 1”, “Becoming, Part 2”), that there are demons who become mortal and learn to be human (Anya), that there are demons who are evil (the Master), that soul stealers can help you when you’ve helped them (“Enemies”), that humans, even our heroes, have evil twins in an alternative universe who are very much our heroes themselves (“The Wish”, Doppelgangland”), that without Buffy’s presence in Sunnydale it would become the “brave new world” of evil vampire capitalism where dwindling numbers of humans are used to satiate vampire bloodlust (“The Wish”), that Buffy’s Watcher Rupert Giles has a demonic past (“The Dark Age”), that Oz is a werewolf (“Phases”), that vampires have emotional attachments (Spike, Drusilla, and Darla ) that we can sympathise and empathise with, and that Slayers can go bad (“Bad Girls”, “Consequences”, “Enemies”). In season four we learn that a covert government operation has dark secrets (“The Initiative”, “The ‘I’ in Team”) and that Maggie Walsh, the head of this commando operation, has created a literal frankensteinian monster (“The I in Team”). In season five we learn that an evil demon can share the same body with a basically good human (Glory and Ben in season five ) and that individual vamps can slowly, through love for someone, come around to the bright side (Spike). In season six we learn that life itself is the “Big Bad” and that Buffy, Willow, Xander, Anya, Spike, and Amy still face the demons within that negatively impact those around them and that humans can be the source of much of the evil in the Buffyverse (the Trio of Warren, Jonathan, and Andrew and our beloved Scoobies themselves). In Buffy otherness and difference then are generally defined on the basis of ethical and moral behaviour. In the Buffyverse, in other words, ethical or moral behaviour is not a prisonhouse of evil. One can, as Cordelia, Spike and Angel show, escape darker hues of grey for lighter ones. Good and evil, in other words, are not as simple as unalloyed black and white and good and evil (as Giles tells Buffy in the pivotal episode “Lie to Me”).

In fact, on a number of occasions Buffy and the Scoobies fail to kill vampires or demons and actually become friends and lovers with them. Buffy refuses to kill Angel even when she believes he has attacked her mother (“Angel”). Rather than kill their friend Oz who the Scoobies learn is a werewolf Willow, Buffy and Giles capture him (“Phases”). Instead of shutting down Willy’s, a local demon hangout, the Scoobies allow the tavern to remain open and use its proprietor as a source of information and over time use less coercive means to obtain this information from him (something the show parodies during season five). Instead of killing Vamp Willow (“I just can’t kill her” Willow says) they return her to her alternative reality through the same magicks that brought her to theirs (“Doppelgangland”). They fail to “dust” former classmate turned vampire Harmony (“The Harsh Light of Day”). Rather than allow the neutered Spike to dust himself (“we know him” Willow reasons) they keep him alive (“Doomed”). In fact, the Scoobies develop relationships with vamps, demons, and monsters. Xander goes to prom with the ex-vengeance demon Anya (“The Prom”). Oz is Willow’s lover and the Scoobies friend. Harmony, who becomes a vampire (“Graduation Day, Part 2”) and is involved in a relationship with Spike (“The Harsh Light of Day”) eventually comes out (recalling the coming out of gays and lesbians) as a vampire to Cordelia in an episode of Angel and struggles, not always successfully, to avoid taking human life in the future (“Disharmony”, fifth season of Angel). There is so much dating between humans and demons on Buffy (Buffy and Angel and Spike, Willow and Oz, Xander and Miss French, Ampata, and Anya/Anyanka), in fact, that Cynthia Fuchs (“Review of Buffy the Vampire Slayer: The Complete Fourth season, PopMatters, 17 June 2003 (http://www.popmatters.com/tv/reviews/b/buffy-complete-season-4.shtml)) suggests that the interspecies nature of most of the sexual relationships makes a statement about Buffy’s take on race. Buffy, it seems, has nuances the manichean inspired eye often misses.

This complexity in Buffy’s theodicy is brought out most clearly in conflicts over the nature of evil between Buffy and Kendra, Buffy and Faith, and Buffy and Riley in the second, third, and fourth seasons. Kendra is guided by a dualism in which all vampires are evil. When she sees Buffy kiss Angel with his game face on she assumes that she, like he, is a vampire. She imprisons Angel in a cage to await a death by sunlight and trails Buffy to Angel’s place where she tries to kill her with no questions asked (“What’s My Line, Part 1”, “What’s My Line, Part 2”). Likewise, Faith sees vamps and demons as pure evil. When she learns that Angel is still alive she assumes it was he who attacked and tried to kill Giles in the library (it was really her new outlaw ex-Watcher Gwendolyn Post) and attempts to kill him only to be stopped by Buffy (“Revelations”) all with no questions asked. When Faith and Buffy run into a demon in one of Sunnydale’s many cemeteries who wants to sell them the important Books of Ascension, Faith, in typical manichean fashion, wants to kill him claiming that a demon is a demon while Buffy points out that this particular demon doesn’t seem fall into the “threat to humanity category” and that they need to find out more about the books he wants to sell them (“Enemies”). Riley, Buffy’s boyfriend and member of the US military special monster killing unit the Initiative, like Kendra and Faith is guided by a belief that humans are good while demons and vampires are bad: “I just suck at this whole grey area stuff” he tells Buffy at one point (“This Year’s Girl”). Soon, however, the manichean mentality that guides him comes under attack when he runs into the Buffster at Willy’s while both of them are searching for the Initiative’s escaped frankensteinian killing machine Adam (“Goodbye Iowa”). Realising that Buffy has known all along about the existence of Willy’s Riley has a manichean meltdown Buffy responds by emphasizing the complexities of good and evil. You can’t, she tells him, judge demons and vampires by their evil cover. Some vamps have souls and do good and some demons are not harmful. It is only with “New Moon Rising” that Riley’s manicheanism truly starts to takes a fall. In that episode Riley learns that the supposedly evil werewolf the Initiative has captured and is “studying” is really someone he knows, Oz, and Buffy’s caution to him that there are degrees of difference between vampires, demons, and monsters really hits home. After much soul searching he tries to help Oz escape the clutches of the Initiative and becomes, by the end of the episode, Riley becomes the “anarchist” his superiors feared he would become if he kept hanging with the Scoobies.

By counterpointing Buffy’s, more nuanced takes on good and evil against the manichean ones of Kendra, Faith, and Riley the show makes clear that Buffy is not the manichean dualist her critics claim her to be. Evil in the Buffyverse, then, is not as uncomplicated as the formulaic us good, them bad mantra that one finds so often in criticism on Buffy and in human life in general. In other words, evil in Buffy is portrayed in more complex and nuanced ways than King would like us to think.

Buffy is closer to the theological universe of Reinhold Niebuhr with its notion of human fallibility than to that of Quakerism with its perception that human beings are inherently good and potentially perfectible (Cf. Gregory Stevenson, Televised Morality: The Case of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Books), p. 73). As Joss has said (Commentary: “The Harvest”, Buffy the Vampire Slayer: The Complete First Season) all of us are potentially Buffy, Willow, Cordelia, and Xander, all of us are, in other words, potentially both cruel and heroic.

Buffy then is neither a perfectionist nor a pacifist text. Perspectives on war and the moral or immoral use of violence have included the just war perspective, the war as a necessary evil perspective, the crusade, and pacifism. The last asserts that all wars are unjust and, in some instances, unnecessary. The just war perspectives see wars as just if they are defensive and if they follow certain criteria during the war (discriminate between combatants and non-combatants and if they respond equally to an attack). This perspective has characterised Roman Catholicism and most types of Protestantism and has been secularised becoming the standard war discourse in most Western states. The war as a necessary evil perspective asserts just that, that war is, sometimes, a necessary evil. Crusades, like those between Christians and Muslims during the Middle Ages, are no holds barred wars between ethnocentrisms each of which see themselves as right and having god on their side. Buffy as Anthony Cordesman notes (“Biological Warfare and the Buffy Paradigm”, Center for Strategic Studies, 29 September 2001) is an example of the new type of strategic thinking needed in a post 9/11 America, reactive defence strategies. In Buffy evil just keeps on coming and is never defeated. Angel tells Buffy in “Gingerbread” that victory is not what they, the Scoobies and their allies, fight for. They fight, he tells her, because there are things worth fighting for. Interestingly a “possessed” Joyce derides the Scoobies reactive defensive strategy in “Gingerbread” for its inability to defeat evil once and for all, an evil that kills “innocent” children. Though Joyce may be speaking the words of the demon that possesses her Joyce is also making a valid point. The Bad Guys, as we know, sometimes speak the truth in Buffy.

Reading Buffy Synopitically: Musings on Doppelgangers in Buffy

Buffy is full of doppelgangers or doubles. There are doubles of Xander (AltXander “The Wish” and the two Xander’s of “The Replacement”). There are doubles of Willow (AltWillow in “The Wish” and the aptly titled “Doppelgangland”). Willow and Tara are to some extent doubles of each other in that they portray different ways one can use magick, Tara responsibly, Willow irresponsibly. There are doubles of Giles, the AltGiles of “The Wish”, Wesley (Season three) and Ethan Rayne (“Halloween”, “The Dark Age”, “Band Candy”, “A New Man”). There are doubles of Giles and Joyce, Buffy’s mother and father figures. Tara takes on the role of Joyce and Giles who are dead and in England respectively during season six. She becomes confidante to Buffy and her warnings to Willow about her use and abuse of wicca power during season six echo those of Giles (“Flooded”; Giles spoke generally of the dangers of magicks in “Passion” and “Becoming, Part 1”). She serves an exemplary moral function in the Buffyverse in Season six by empathising and sympathizing with Willow and Buffy, by counseling them, by not condemning them, but by being honest with them about the problems associated with their actions (“Tabula Rasa”, “Dead Things” cf. how Joyce and Giles deal with Buffy’s problems in “Innocence”). There are several doubles of Buffy. Kendra is a buttoned down Slayer version of Buffy. Faith is an unbuttoned double of Buffy. As several commentators have noted, the AltBuffy of “The Wish” is, very much like Faith, an impulsive loner filled with darkness itching to get into battle. It is no accident that AltBuffy appears for the first time in the third Season, the same season Faith arrives in Sunnydale. The intentional use of Shakespeare’s Othello in “Earshot” emphasises this doubling by pointing up the mutual jealousies of Buffy and Faith and Buffy’s fear that Angel is romantically interested in Faith. Finally, Buffy and Cordelia are to some extent doubles of each other. The Buffy of Hemery High is just like the Cordelia of Season one and Season two (“Becoming, Part One”). It shoud be noted that Cordelia becomes more like Buffy over the course of Buffy and Angel.

Reading Buffy Synopically: Musings on Slayerness

With respect to the Slayer power issues associated particularly in season seven, just as there is a contradiction in Christian history between egalitarianism (the ministry of all believers) and the hierarchical (the various offices—charismatic, patriarchal-patrimonial, and bureaucratic—that go back to Paul) there is a contradiction in the Buffyverse between the egalitarianism, potential and actual, of the Slayers and the Potentials and the leading role Buffy and to a lesser extent Faith play in the battle against the First in season seven. Of course, age and longevity are a factor in Buffy’s and Faith’s leading roles in the battles against the First which is why Buffy and again to a lesser extent Faith act as teacher to the Potentials. Age and the experience that age brings is the great unequaliser and is related to growing up, something that is one of the major themes of the series.

Reading Buffy Synopitically: Musings on Buffy's Slayers

So many of the claims that Buffy the Vampire Slayer is ethnocentric, racist, classist, and sexist derive from analysts perception of the differences which characterise the three main Slayers in the Buffyverse, Kendra, Faith, and Buffy. Lynne Edwards (“Slaying in Black and White: Kendra as Tragic Mulatta in Buffy” in Rhonda Wilcox and David Lavery (eds.); Fighting the Forces: What’s at Stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer (Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield, 2003)) argues that the depiction of Kendra in season two of Buffy is patented racism while Elyce Rae Helford (Helford: “My Emotions Give Me Power: The Containment of Girls Anger in Buffy” in Rhonda Wilcox and David Lavery (eds.); Fighting the Forces) asserts that the depiction of Faith is classist. But is the depiction of the relationship between the Slayers really racist and classist?

Edwards makes much racist hay out of Buffy’s behaviour toward Kendra when she first arrives in Sunnydale. And Buffy does react negatively to Kendra during their get to know you phase just as she reacts negatively to Faith later on (“What’s My Line” and “Faith, Hope, and Trick”). Buffy’s reaction, however, is the product of teenage petty jealousies rather than of racism.

Buffy definitely has her flaws. And one of these is her rather “high schoolish” reaction to Kendra when she first meets her, but then she is a high school teen. Buffy is having a difficult time coming to grips with the fact that she is no longer the only “Chosen One”. She sees Kendra as Giles the second generation and is jealous of the attention she receives from him. To Buffy, Kendra is the by the Watcher’s book Slayer type that she has always refused to be.

But Buffy is not the only Slayer whose first impressions are negative ones. When Kendra sees Buffy kissing Angel she assumes that Buffy too is a vampire and sets out to do what any good Slayer should do, slay. Kendra also reacts in a knee-jerk stuffy Slayer way to the Scoobies. She is appalled that Giles allows Buffy to have friends who help her to fight the forces: “and you allow this” she asks Giles (“What’s My Line, Part 2”). To her a Slayer always fights alone and always fights unknown. Soon things change, however. Buffy gets over her jealousies and Kendra lets her manichean and by the Watcher’s book guards down and soon the Slayers are comparing notes. And as they do this they begin to bond, though not without degree of underlying competitiveness. Kendra thinks that Buffy is too emotional while Buffy finds Kendra too unemotional. To make her point about emotions Buffy tells Kendra that although she is technically a better fighter than Buffy, there is no way she could defeat her in a fight. “My anger gives me power”, explains the Buffster (What’s My Line, Part 2). Though Kendra’s anger grows as a result of this goading she soon gets the point, anger does indeed give a Slayer power. Kendra returns the favour when she uses her Slayer power to save Buffy from an assassination attempt by one of a group of assassins (the Order of Taraka) who have been sent by Spike to kill her.
This bond between the two Slayers does not end with Kendra’s death. When Buffy finds Kendra’s body in the library she is devastated (“Becoming, Part 1). As she kneels by Kendra one can clearly see the tears in her eyes and the pain on her face. And although Kendra is gone she is not forgotten by Buffy. The stake Kendra gave her, “Mr. Pointy”, remains so much her prized possession that she has it bronzed and it serves as a poignant reminder to both Buffy and the viewers of Kendra, the Vampire Slayer (“Helpless”, “Choices”, “The Freshman”).

Edwards and Helford also make much of the fact that Faith isn’t fully integrated into Buffy’s world or the Scooby Gang but rather is marginalised from it when she arrives in Sunnydale. They both chalk this up to middle class classism. There is no doubt that Faith is never fully integrated into the Slayer in crowd. Buffy, as she was jealous of Kendra, is jealous of the attention the other Scoobies pay to Faith when she first arrives in the Dale (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”). Buffy, however, realises that she is jealous of Faith and this time she controls her teenage jealousies at least at first. She makes several attempts to make Faith feel part of her world. She invites Faith to dinner at the Summer’s home (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”), granted partly at Willow’s prompting. She goes over to Faith’s “Spartan” motel room for some damage control (“Revelations”). Later she invites Faith, granted partly at her Mom’s prompting, to Christmas dinner with her and her mom and trusts Faith enough to watch and protect her mom while she goes in search of the First Evil that is causing Angel to “loose it” (“Amends”).

But Buffy isn’t the only one with jealousies. Willow is also jealous of Faith for stealing “her people” (“Consequences”, “Doppelgangland”). When Faith and Buffy do the Slayer thing spending increasing amounts of time together excluding the Scoobies in the process, Willow is jealous and is afraid that Faith is replacing her as Buffy’s best friend (“Bad Girls”). When Willow learns that Xander has had sex with Faith (another example of Xander’s slayer fixation?) she is devastated (“Consequences”).

It is clear that both Buffy and Willow’s jealousies of Faith and the exclusion this results in do play an important role in alienating her from the gang. And it is this sense of alienation, in part, which sends her spiraling further downward into the darkness. It is not true, however, that Faith didn’t have a fear of exclusion and a problematic sense of self before she arrived in Sunnydale. Faith is damaged psychological goods before she comes to the Dale as Buffy realises in “Faith, Hope, and Trick”. Faith had a difficult childhood (“Enemies”). She comes from a broken home and has abandonment issues because of this (“Enemies”). Her mother was a drunk and Faith believes she never loved her (“Enemies”). She was never one of the high school in-crowd and dropped out of school before she finished it (“Faith, Hope, and Trick” 3003). When she became a Slayer she watched a vicious vampire kill her Watcher before her very eyes (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”). She is impulsive (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”, “Revelations”, “Bad Girls”) living life on the edge (“Graduation Day Part 1”). She takes what she wants (“Bad Girls”). She is a loner and prefers to slay alone or to slay by her own often dangerous rules (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”, “Bad Girls”). She doesn’t trust people and uses others for her own pleasure and once she is done with them discards them just as she discards Xander after they have sex together (“Homecoming”, “The Zeppo”, “Consequences”). She has a tendency to see herself as better than others. She is, as she says, the Slayer after all (“Bad Girls” 3014). This sense of superiority draws her to her fellow uberSlayer Buffy and when Buffy likewise becomes enticed by the thrill of slaying it draws them both toward the darkness that we later learn is a part of every Slayer’s being (“Bad Girls”, “Consequences”, “Restless”, “Fool for Love”, and “Intervention”). After Faith accidentally kills the Deputy Mayor Buffy begins to reject this darkness. Faith, however, isn’t able to escape the darkness. Moreover, the heavy handed tactics of the patriarchal Watcher’s Council who kidnap and imprison her doesn’t help her but instead drives her further into the darkness (“Consequences”). Only when she turns to the dark side does Faith find a father figure in a man who is about to ascend to demon status, the Mayor of Sunnydale (“Consequences”, “Enemies”, “Graduation Day, Part 1”, “Graduation Day, Part 2”). She becomes a killer for him (“Enemies” 3017, “Choices”, “Graduation Day, Part 1”). Only when she takes over Buffy’s body (“Who are You”) does Faith feel what it is like to be affected by the love of family and friends, and feel the admiration of those she saves from certain death. It is finally Angel who helps bring her back from her personal hell of loneliness, solitariness, self loathing, sense of superiority, emotional distance, the torture and physical brutalisation others, and her death wish helping her restore the dominance of the light within in the First season Angel (“Five By Five”, “Sanctuary”). By the seventh season of Buffy and the fourth of Angel, Faith has paid her dues and emerges from the darkness of her past to fight a resurrected Angelus and to once again fight the forces of darkness by Buffy’s side.

It is important to remember that Faith is as jealous of Buffy as Buffy is of her (“Consequences”, “Enemies”). She is, as she says, tired of hearing about Buffy, Buffy, Buffy when she too is doing her part to save the world. It’s Faith who rejects Buffy’s invitation to Christmas dinner in “Amends” —though much dirty water has admittedly already passed under the Buffy and Faith bridge. This is hardly the stuff of exclusion based on class prejudice. Rather it’s the stuff of deeply ambiguous and contradictory characters. Faith, like every Slayer, like every human, and like many demons in the Buffyverse, has the potential for both good and evil.

On one point the critics are right: Buffy is unlike other known Slayers in terms of background. Kendra is a Jamaican. She has lived, studied, and trained with her Watcher alone almost from birth. Her parents gave her exclusively to her Watcher to raise and she has seen her parents only on rare occasions since (“What’s My Line Part 2”). She has been raised to be deferential to her Watcher and to men in general (“What’s My Line Part 2”). She cares little about the mundane things of life like clothes and boys. She has only the shirt on her back and goes into shy mode when a boy walks into the room (“What’s My Line Part 2”). She puts virtually all of her efforts into Slaying (“What’s My Line, Part 1”, “What’s My Line, Part 2”, “Becoming, Part 1”). Faith, on the other hand, hails from Boston or near Boston (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”). She has a wardrobe basically limited to dark colours and leather; her favourite colour is black (Angel “Five by Five”). She lives in a run down motel on the wrong side of the tracks (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”, “Bad Girls”, “Consequences”, “Enemies”).

Buffy, on the other hand, lives in a nice middle class home in, as the African American vampire Mr. Trick notes with great irony, a “strictly for the Caucasian persuasion” (a bit of an exaggeration) middle class community with a death rate which rivals that of DC (“Faith, Hope and Trick”). Her mom is divorced and apparently owns a local gallery in town which appears to provide a good living for them (“Welcome to the Hellmouth”). The Summers’ house is filled with nice furniture and assorted nick knacks and Summers mother and daughter seem to have everything they want including extensive wardrobes. Like most teenagers Buffy likes to shop (she bewails her inability to do so because of her “job” in “What’s My Line, Part 1), is concerned about her clothes (“Welcome to the Hellmouth”), worries about how her hair looks (“I Robot, You Jane”), worries about how she looks in general (“Halloween” 2006), and thinks a lot about dating. She tends to like her men dangerous (or “undead” as Xander quips) and studly and who can fight the good fight with her (“Prophecy Girl”, “The Pack”, “Reptile Boy” (with its “When you kiss me I want to die” statement of Buffy to Angel), “Pangs”, “Something Blue”). She spends a lot of time with her friends.

Though Buffy is middle class, her class and status background is rather more complex than commentators often make it. Buffy is not your run of the mill So Cal bourgeois valley girl. She is a dedicated pedestrian who doesn’t own an automobile and who rarely drives one (“Band Candy”, “Something Blue”, and “Who Are You”). We rarely see her at those staples of Southern California bourgeois life the beach (“Go Fish” and “Buffy vs. Dracula”) or the mall (“Bad Eggs”). Though she has an extensive wardrobe she spends most of her life selflessly fighting the forces of evil that live in or gravitate to Sunnydale because it sits on a Hellmouth. Her fight against the forces has cost her several staples of middle class status including popularity, cheerleading, and high school crowns. It has made her an adult before her time. Though she lives in America she never fights for the American government or the American corporate way of life (same difference?). She is simply the latest in a long line of global Slayers fighting a global war against evil they can never fully win. Her one brief attempt to work with a secret American military organization, the Initiative, goes awry after she asks too many questions and they try to eliminate her (“The I in Team”).

Some analysts have suggested that Buffy’s puns are symbols of a generalised (and negatively coded) middle class whiteness. While Buffy’s punning abilities may be a sign of class, intelligence, and education they are also something, as Jana Reiss suggests, that show that when she is fighting vampires, demons, and other assorted nasties (generally males) she is in power and in control. As Reiss notes Buffy’s punning ability declines as her confidence and hence her power in fighting evil declines (“Helpless”, “Superstar”, the sixth season when she is just “going through the motions” after she is pulled out of heaven by her friends). One aspect of the fact that Buffy’s puns represent that she is in control is her use of them when she rebels against patriarchal power. Her puns aimed at Giles and the Watchers (“Never Kill a Boy on the First Date”, “Helpless”, and “Checkpoint”) clearly undermine their authority and point up her autonomy from them. Finally, on an institutional level the Slayer’s puns may be devices put into the script by the writers to relieve the intense emotional tensions in the scripts. Interestingly David Fritts in is essay on Buffy and Beowulf “Warrior Heroes: Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Beowulf”, paper presented at The Slayage Conference on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Nashville, TN, 28-30 March 2004 ) argues that puns function similarly in Beowulf.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer neither celebrates nor sanctifies its hero’s middle class background or middle class status. Rather, it often satirises and by implication condemns it. The town in which Buffy lives and fights evil can be read (as is often the case in the horror genre) as a quaint little bourgeois California town whose surface “normality” hides real evil lurking beneath it. Over the years Buffy has struggled against several forms of bourgeois evil in Sunnydale. She fought a stay at home mom trying to recover her high school cheerleading dreams by switching bodies with her daughter (“The Witch”). She railed against the absurdities of the politically correct term “undead American” (“When She Was Bad”). She brought down the members, past and present, of an elite fraternity whose wealth and status has come from sacrificing young high school girls (“Reptile Boy”). She led exploited workers in a hell dimension against their brutal masters with hammer and sickle in hand (“Anne”). She fought a vampire in an alternative universe who has adapted mass production, the most demonic of human inventions he claims, to meet the consumption needs of the vampire population that dominates the alternative Sunnydale (“The Wish”). She fought Sunnydale High School’s swimming coach who was using steroids to enhance his team’s performance in order to win the swimming championship in the process turning them into monsters (“Go Fish”). She fought the compassionate conservative mayor of Sunnydale who rhapsodises about family values, clean living, and bringing order to Sunnydale in between preparing for his ascension into an evil high school youth eating snake (season three). She expresses frustration with the abrupt price rise of message boards in Sunnydale after everyone has lost their voices (“Hush”). She led a group of “anarchists” against a government bureaucracy that captures, tortures, investigates, kills, and creates Hostile Sub Terrestrials (season four). She fought one of her toughest battles against a god who puts the consumer in consumer society and consumer capitalism (Season five). She and the Scoobies fight and condemn, on a number of occasions, the structure of high school status culture (the Scoobies are part of the high school out crowd) perhaps most notably when the former ultimate in girl Cordelia calls her former in crowd friends, the Cordettes, “sheep” (“Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered”). She and the Scoobies fight against and condemn high school authoritarianism and semi-fascism (“Gingerbread”). And finally she and the Scoobies fight against and condemn misogyny on several occasions (“Some Assembly Required”, “Reptile Boy”, “I Only Have Eyes for You”, “Faith, Hope, and Trick”, “Beauty and the Beasts”, “Gingerbread”, the seventh season woman hating former southern preacher named Caleb who is the embodiment of the First Evil who the Scoobies and the Potentials are fighting).

Class and status may differentiate Buffy, Kendra, and Faith but they are not at the heart of what makes Buffy different from Kendra and Faith. Buffy is also very different from them in terms of personality and character traits. Buffy, in fact, is kind of a middle way between the by the Watcher’s book Kendra and the solitary Faith who lives for the “uuh”.

Like Faith, Buffy is rebellious: “I’ve never been one to tow the line”, she says, but her type of rebellion is very different than Faith’s—she’s a rebel with a moral cause (“Primeval”). While often questioning authority she still accepts the counsel of her mentor and Watcher Rupert Giles, though not to the degree Kendra does. She, unlike either Kendra or Faith, accepts and sometimes needs the help of her close friends and comrades in arms Willow and Xander (and an ever changing array of others including Cordelia, Oz, Anya, Tara, and Andrew). At first, slaying is a job for her but gradually, and with Kendra’s help, Buffy comes to realise that it is something that is very much a part of her.

As is true of Kendra and Faith, Buffy lives primarily in the now (“Bad Eggs”, “The Harsh Light of Day”). She takes charge in a crisis and she is better at strategising than at research (“Welcome to the Hellmouth”, “The Harvest”, “Earshot”, Graduation Day, Part 2). Her friends usually do this for her and are much better at it than she is (for example, “Never Kill a Boy on the First Date”, “Reptile Boy”). She isn’t, unlike Kendra, even aware that the Slayer’s Handbook exists (“What’s My Line, Part 1”). Although she is a Slayer Buffy unlike Kendra and Faith tries to lead a “normal” life. She lives with her mother. She attends high school and later college. She is smart and no one should ever take her punning for granted (“Anne”). She works for the Watcher’s Council until they refuse to cure her vampire boyfriend after Faith gone bad poisons him (“Graduation Day, Part 2”). She then becomes an independent Slayer working closely with friends to save the world from evil. Life as a Slayer and as a teenager and young woman has made Buffy angsty, though in a different way from Faith. She never forgets her moral responsibilities as a Slayer and she remains committed to the good fight against the “big bads” and the not so big bads (“Once More, with Feeling” and “Dead Things”) despite her feelings of alienation from almost everyone and everything save her friends.

As Buffy experiences more of life she matures and, unlike Kendra and Faith, begins to see things less in terms of manichean black and white and more in terms shades of grey (“Enemies”, “Goodbye Iowa”). Vampires, demons, witches, and monsters are not simply evil to her. She loves one. She is close friends with another. She distinguishes between those who are harmful and those who are not.

While there are differences between Buffy, Kendra, and Faith, they are, in the final analysis, all Slayers. And as Slayers they are “freeks” who look out for each other. Kendra helps save Buffy from an assassin and helps save Angel from the evil that Spike and Drusilla try to do (“What’s My Line, Part 1 and 2”), Faith saves Buffy from an attack by Mr. Trick on the docks (“Consequences”) and relays critical information about the Mayor’s power and weaknesses (“take what you need”) to her in a shared dream after she has turned to the dark side (“Graduation Day, Part 2”). Buffy follows Faith into the sewers to help fight the Eliminati though the odds aren’t in their favour (“Bad Girls”). As Slayers they are heroic and courageous. Buffy and the gang heroically and courageously save the world on a number of occasions (“Prophecy Girl”, “Innocence”, “Becoming, Part 2”, “The Zeppo”, “Doomed”, “The Gift”), Kendra helps in the fight against Acathla (“Becoming, Part 1”) while Faith helps Buffy and the gang save the world when a priestly cult tries to reopen the Hellmouth (“The Zeppo”). As Slayers they are all impulsive—Kendra assumes that Buffy is a vampire after seeing her kiss Angel (What’s My Line, Part 1”), Faith goes into battle several times on a whim (“Faith, Hope, and Trick”, “Bad Girls”) while Buffy destroys the mark of Gachnar even before Giles can finish a sentence explaining that destroying the mark brings Gachnar into existence rather than stops him from rising (“Fear, Itself”). As Slayers they all make mistakes—Kendra mistakenly attacks Angel and Buffy (“What’s My Line, Part 1”), Faith mistakenly kills the Deputy Mayor (“Bad Girls”) while Buffy is mistakenly jealous of Kendra and Faith (“What’s My Line, Part 1”, “Faith, Hope, and Trick”).

As Slayers Buffy, Kendra, and Faith mirror each other in a number of ways and can thus be seen as doubles of one another. Buffy and Kendra are both killed by vampires through the power of hypnosis (“Prophecy Girl” 1001, “Becoming, Part 1”). Buffy shares the same joy in slaying that Faith does and like Faith equates slaying with food or sex (Buffy and Angel have sex for the first time after battling the Judge in “Surprise”, Buffy and Riley have sex after fighting the Polgara demon in “The I in Team”, Buffy and Riley’s have sex after battling “horny” and “fangy” in “Where the Wild Things Are”, Dawn notes the slaying and food connection in “Wrecked”). Buffy’s casual sex with Spike is akin to Faith’s sense that sex is for pleasure. Buffy sees Faith as psychotic killer while Faith sees Buffy as proper and joyless (“Who Are You”) and a maniacal murderer (“This Year’s Girl”). The Buffy of “The Wish” (“I don’t play well with others”) bears more than a passing resemblance to the Faith we know and love in seasons three and four. Buffy is as convinced of Slayer superiority as Faith at least for a moment (“Bad Girls”, “Consequences”, and “Conversations with Dead People”). Buffy’s self loathing after she thinks she has killed a human being in “Dead Things” is very much like Faith’s self loathing in “Who Are You”, “Five by Five”, and “Sanctuary” (the last two on Angel) while Buffy’s inferiority complex about her superiority complex is very similar to Faith’s inferiority and superiority complexes (“Conversations with Dead People”, “Consequences”, and “Who Are You”). Buffy is as fascinated by the darkness in herself as Faith (“Bad Girls”, “Restless”, “Buffy vs. Dracula”, and “Into the Woods”). As Slayers, then, Buffy, Kendra, and Faith share heroism, courage, a concern for each other, Slayer frailties, and a perhaps not so healthy interest in darkness and death. Whether these traits are peculiarly bourgeois is debatable. Whether they are peculiarly Buffy, Kendra, and Faith isn’t. They aren’t.

What all of these differences and similarities point up is that there are differences between Buffy, Kendra, and Faith as Slayers that have little to do with class or ethnicity. They have everything to do with how each of these Slayers reacts to being a Slayer and the circumstances and experiences being a Slayer brings to their lives. In fact, one of the major themes of seasons one, two, and three of Buffy is Buffy’s coming to terms with her Slayer status. In “Prophecy Girl”, as she explains to Giles, she just wants a normal life. Circumstances, however, force her to choose being a Slayer over a normal life. And while she periodically bemoans what being a Slayer means for her social life (in “What’s My Line, Part 1, she points out that being a Slayer means she rarely gets to shop) she eventually comes to accept that being a Slayer is not a job it’s, as Kendra tells her, who she is (“What’s My Line, Part 2”).

The differences between Buffy and Faith some critics make so much of are experiential and moral rather than class or ethnic. Buffy responds to the accidental killing of Deputy Mayor Alan Finch by Faith by pulling back from the see, want, take philosophy Faith propounds and to which she was drawn if only briefly (“Bad Girls” and “Consequences”). While Faith argues that as Slayers she and Buffy are superior to other humans (“we’re different, we’re built to be warriors”) and that their actions in fighting demons and other nasties and saving the world on more than one occasion more than balance the accidental death of Finch out, Buffy argues that Slayers cannot live beyond the laws of humans and that killing a human being is wrong. I will mourn Finch’s loss she tells Faith (“Consequences”). As Joss Whedon, Doug Petrie, and Marti Noxon said the differences between Faith and Buffy are grounded in the abuse of power that can come from being a Slayer not in class or ethnicity (Comments of Joss Whedon, Marti Noxon, and Doug Petrie in the Season three Overview, Buffy the Vampire Slayer: The Complete Third Season on DVD).

Thursday, 8 September 2011

The King of Comedy?

There was a Jerry Lewis marathon on Monday past (5 September 2011) on Antenna TV, one of the over the air retro channels that has hit the airwaves since the advent of digital television. I didn't really watch any of the films--Don't Raise the Bridge Lower the River, The Big Mouth, Three on a Couch, Hook, Line, and Sinker--that Antenna TV was showing as part of its marathon, presumably as a tie in to the MDA, Muscular Dystrophy Labour Day, Telethon, that Lewis presided over between 1966 and this year, 2011--in full though I did catch bits and pieces out of the corner of my eyes and ears. I have never really been a Jerry Lewis fan. His films, to me, have always seemed, like the Star Wars saga of George Lucas, who, by the way, apparently took a film class with Lewis at USC, as did Steven Spielberg, too juvenile for me. I do, however, have an appreciation for Lewis just as I have an appreciation for but not a devotion to Lewis's cinematic mentor Frank Tashlin. I appreciate, like many critics worldwide, Lewis's directorial skills particularly with respect to mise-en-scene, the magnificent almost Brectian set in The Ladies Man, for instance, and I do think that there is something to the notion, a notion proffered by several French and American critics, that Lewis, like Tashlim, is reflective of, a mirror to, American schizophrenia something reflected in the multiple characters Lewis often plays in his films and the American extreme as reflected in the extremes of Lewis's very American multiple characters.

It is really another aspect of the cult or anti-cult of Jerry Lewis that fascinates me. Whenever I think, for some reason, of Jerry Lewis I can't but help think about the French, or at least some French critics, devotion to the work of Jerry Lewis and I can't help but think about how much Americans, well some Americans, criticise the French and generalise this Lewis devotion to the French public in general, something that may tell us something about the francophobia present in contemporary American culture. I actually find this American criticism of the French praise for Lewis odd and hypocritical for in order to damn French critics for their Lewismania Americans have to forget (short memory syndrome) that it was US studios who made Lewis films for fun and mostly for profit, that it was the US who awarded Lewis a Golden Apple Award (1954), an American Comedy Award (1997), and a prime time Emmy (2005), that it was the US comedy club, film going, and TV watching American public who made Jerry Lewis one of the stars in the Hollywood firmament, and that it was the US public who tuned into and gave money to Jerry for Jerry's kids every Labour Day for some forty plus years.

Thursday, 18 August 2011

Sexism and the Retro Channel or, the Joys and Not so Joys of Retro TV...

One of the great joys of the digital age in television broadcasting, at least for me, has been the appearance of retro television stations on the digital TV dial here in Albany, New York, USA. Recently I have been watching two new retro channels on the Albany television airwaves (we already had one, Retro Television), Me TV and Antenna TV. Me TV runs shows like the Mary Tyler Moore Show, Taxi, the Bob Newhart Show, the Honeymooners, Streets of San Francisco, Gunsmoke, and I Love Lucy. It recently celebrated Lucy's one hundredth birthday with a three day Lucython. Antenna TV broadcasts shows like Married...With Children (one of my favourites and one of the most subversive TV shows ever on US television in my opinion), All in the Family, Good Times, the George Burns and Gracie Allen Show, The Monkees, and Three's Company.

What I love perhaps most of all about Antenna TV is that between 5 am and 1 am (now 11 am) the network runs movies. I am an old movie watcher and cinephile. I have been watching films since before I was a teen. During my teen years my sister, Cindy, and I would plop ourselves down in front of the tube and spend most of our weekends watching movie after movie on Channel 4, Bloomington-Indianapolis.

So in some ways the rebirth of retro television and old movies on America's terrestrial airwaves is kind of like a trip down a wonderful memory lane for me. But it is also a trip down a not so memory lane. Another of the retro channels, Retro Television, has been showing shows I recall from my youth but never watched, shows like Naked City and Route 66. I didn't pay attention to these shows when I was young because I was young. They are adult shows with a darkness that you rarely see on American television today and really don't appeal to a youth audience. They are rather like sixty minute teleplays that hearken back to the teletheatre of the golden age of television. But they both are, in another way, very different from the teleplays of the past. Both are cinematic and both were filmed largely, and in the case of Route 66, entirely on location. For this reason Route 66 is like jumping into a time machine and traveling from the America of 2011 back to the America of the early 1960s because it shows an America, an America that stretches from Boston to Philadelphia to Pittsburgh to Chicago to New Orleans and to Malibu, that simply doesn't exist any more. Route 66 is, in part, a moving archival picture of the American and Canadian (two episodes were filmed in the Great White North) past.

What I don't recall from my youth are some of the films Antenna TV is running. Recently I saw Anthony Mann's noir meets the French Revolution Reign of Terror (aka, Black Book, 1949). I have long loved Mann's films including Winchester 73 (1950), Bend of the River (1953), Naked Spur (1953), and The Man from Laramie (1955) with their noir aesthetic, spectacular landscapes, and obsessed revenge driven anti-hero fallen male heroes. I loved Reign of Terror. It had Mann's trademark noir aesthetic and obsessed male anti-hero heroes along and some wonderfully claustrophobic sets. I am really glad I finally got to see most of this film.

Another film I was really glad I finally got to see, but for a different reason, was a film I had never heard of before, Columbia's Ann Carvers Profession (1933). Ann Carver's Profession stars Fay Wray as Ann and Gene Raymond as her husband Bill. It was directed by Edward Buzzell and written by noted writer Robert Riskin, who would collaborate on a number of films with film auteur Frank Capra including Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936), You Can't Take It with You (1938), and Meet John Doe (1941).

As Ann Carver's Profession begins we meet Bill, a man trying to live down the fact that he is a football star at Hampden University, he wants to be taken seriously, and Ann, a student of law at Hampden and a waitress with whom Bill is in love. Very quickly the film moves from the restaurant that Ann works in and Bill is eating at to a Bill and Ann who are married. Bill is now working in a seemingly dead end job at an architectural firm in a big city. Ann, despite having a law degree and having passed the bar, is a housefrau. When Bill and Ann go to a party Ann overhears two lawyers talking about one of their cases. She adds her two cents worth telling the august lawyer that his jury strategy is all wrong, a jury of women in the trial of a woman, she says, is never a good idea. Women, she says, are petty towards one another. The lawyer tells Bill that anytime Ann wants a job at her law firm she has one. Ann, of course, jumps at the chance and once she gets a chance to try a case on her own she becomes a star in the legal firmament of big city even making the front pages of newspapers again and again as she tries cases again and again. There is a remarkable scene in the film that shows us how Ann became a legal star. In a courtroom stunt Ann brings in a group of women in bathing suits to prove to her prosecutor adversary, and, by extension, the jury, that even he and they cannot tell a white woman from a black woman despite the prosecutors claim that he and every other lunkheaded person, including Ann's client who claims he didn't know that the woman he was dating was black, should and could tell the difference between black and white.

But while Ann's star is rising Bill's is stagnating. While Ann is bringing home the bacon, Bill can't even afford to pay the servants from his meager income. Eventually Bill jumps at a chance to make a hundred (or was it two hundred?) dollars a night crooning at a local nightclub. The nightclub, however, pulls Ann and Bill apart. Ann thinks that what Bill is doing is beneath him. It is at the nightclub that Bill meets another singer, the sexy girl from the proverbial wrong side of the tracks, Carole Rodgers (Claire Dodd). Carole has the hots for Bill. And when Ann, who convinces her crowd to come and see Bill croon, sees Carole kiss Bill, Ann, in a jealous rage walks out of the nightclub but not before throwing a handful of loose change at Bill.

In the next scene we see Bill and Carole in an apartment. Carole is drunk. Bill, separated from Ann, is awash in cynicism. When Bill leaves for the nightclub for work the drunk Carol hits her head on the sofa and kills herself by hanging thanks to a necklace around her neck that gets caught on the wooden end of the sofa. Bill is, of course, this is a Hollywood film after all, accused of murdering Carole and eventually its Ann to the rescue. In an impassioned closing Ann blames herself for what happened to Bill because she should have been at home taking care of hearth and home and not at work making more money than Bill sending him eventually into a downward spiral of self-pity, self-hate, and depression. The movie ends in almost fairy tale fashion (and this long before Pretty Woman), Bill has become a famous architect while Ann is at home enjoying the fruits of Bill's new found fame and wealth. All is now right with the world of Hollywood's cult of domesticity.

I am not sure I have ever seen a film as blatantly condemnatory of married women in the workplace and married women in the professions than Ann Carver's Profession. Ann Carver's Profession seems to be a moral tale about what happens when women take jobs in the male dominated world of the professions. They, the film seems to teach and tell us, end up emasculating their married men sending them into pits of depression and self-hatred. All those academics who seem to think that almost every film ever made, particularly in Hollywood, reflects and recapitulates the sexist cult of domesticity should see this film. I am, in a weird sort of way, glad I did for it was, once one got beyond the neanderthalic message of the film, a well made and well acted movie.

Postscript
I recently saw another film on Antenna TV produced at Columbia entitled They All Kissed the Bride (1942). This film, in combination with Ann Carver's Profession, has made me wonder whether we might be able to delineate a subgenre of Hollywood comedy that we might call the women should be women cycle.

They All Kissed the Bride, stars Joan Crawford as M.J. (Margaret) Drew, the masculine like and ruthless executive of a trucking company, and Melvin Douglas as Michael Holmes a proletariat friendly muckraking writer who is researching a sensational book on how ruthlessly M.J. runs her company. A chance encounter between the two leads to our heroine, who has never experienced the "joys" of romance, going weak in the knees, a sign, M.J's mother tells her, of love. As the film progresses the tough minded M.J. gradually gives into her apparently unconscious romantic feelings and longings, feelings and longings apparently every woman has, and the once masculine like M.J. is slowly but surely transformed from a businessman into a woman. The film ends with M.J. seemingly losing her obsessive interest in her business as she and Michael go off on their honeymoon for days, weeks, if not months.

The message of And They All Kissed the Bride seems, at least to me, to be that beneath every career minded masculinised woman lurks a real romantic female just waiting to get out if only the right man would come along. There is, however, a degree of ambiguity in the films ending: will M.J. return from her romantic interlude ready to run her company again but this time as a businesswoman, in, in other words, a more feminist and caring way, or will she settle into domestic bliss where she takes care of Michael and Michael's proletarian home while Michael resumes his crusade against ruthless capitalist bosses? Unfortunately, time will not tell.